If I was an American citizen, yes I would vote for Obama. Not that I agree on the healthcare situation, :/ that just sucks!
The problem I see over that side of the pond is that any president in office does not have anywhere near ALL control. This should be a good thing. Behind any president will be those “others” grinding them down and constantly pushing them into making a hell of a lot of wrong decisions, for humanity and decisions in favour of the elite! Same for the UK with the elite. So my main reason for voting for Obama would be the fact that he is not the war mongering puppet that Bush was. Plus thankfully, he is not vain and full of self importance, so won´t be very easily fooled. So personally speaking, I would feel far safer with him having "some say" over any future conflicts this world will no doubt encounter. Whenever America is involved in war the rest of us have to fall into line.
end this pointless Afghanistan war, and NOT be the war monger that Bush was??? Will he work with bringing both large and small industries back into America and assist the small struggling companies, or will he remain in the pocket of the large corporations as has previous presidents? Next question will he help the people of America to have a better health care system?
Finally, if Clint Eastwood would sign a guarantee this man WILL keep his word and what would he do, if Romney told him to go... --- himself
After viewing your link and reading your post. You seem to imply Romney is advocating war without just cause. I would hope if Obama somehow pulls off getting re-elected he will take the same stance also.
I ask you and all who use the term war monger in their delusional attempt to pretend everyone in the world can hold hands and sing "Kumbaya" and live in harmony in spite of greed and religion, step out of their perfect fairy tale world for a minute and answer this. Is your solution to this problem to have the rest of the world sit back close their eyes and do nothing while this takes place??
Read it carefully. Then imagine if you will, your family listening to the news hearing someone of great power saying this about your country.
Regarding the link, it is only what Israel have been doing to the Palestinians for decades (in 1914 Jews comprised only 12 percent of the total population of Palestine), but no one helps them reclaim their dwindling land. Why has there been no intervention from the USA to free them from occupation? The most likely reason is because there is nothing for the U.S to gain. Going to war with another country with tenuous reasons is warmongering, Bush did it with Iraq and Romney will do it with Iran, he has already pointed to conflict whilst visiting Israel to bolster the Jewish vote back home. The Iranians have been chairing Non-Aligned Movement where the supreme leader Ali Khamenei spoke up for global nuclear disarmament, which is something you don’t get reported in the main stream media.
The Middle East is a hot bed at the moment and provocative speeches by politicians does not help. It would appear Obama is trying with diplomacy, sanctions and cyber attacks. Romney would not think it out and go in all guns blazing which would accelerate the world to another world war.